Fully referenced, delivered on time. Get the extra support you require now.
You will soon receive an email with a direct link to your profile, where you can update your you do not receive this email, please contact us .
If you’re looking for a great essay service then you should check out https://
The Second Discourse , like the first, was a response to a question put forth by the academy of Dijon: “What is the origin of inequality among men; and is it authorized by the natural law?” Rousseau’s response to this question, the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality , is significantly different from the First Discourse for several reasons. First, in terms of the academy’s response, the Second Discourse was not nearly as well received. It exceeded the desired length, it was four times the length of the first, and made very bold philosophical claims; unlike the First Discourse , it did not win the prize. However, as Rousseau was now a well-known and respected author, he was able to have it published independently. Secondly, if the First Discourse is indicative of Rousseau as a “counter-Enlightenment” thinker, the Second Discourse , by contrast, can rightly be considered to be representative of Enlightenment thought. This is primarily because Rousseau, like Hobbes, attacks the classical notion of human beings as naturally social. Finally, in terms of its influence, the Second Discours e is now much more widely read, and is more representative of Rousseau’s general philosophical outlook. In the Confessions , Rousseau writes that he himself sees the Second Discourse as far superior to the first.